Obama:the hypocrit with double standards.Why Obama supporters should feel buyer's remorse

If you have been watching the news lately you may have seen all of Obama's surrogates making personal attacks on Hillary's character while Obama continues to speak against the divisive politics that have come out against him. Come on Obama, don't be hypocritical, if you detest the negative rhetoric then your advisers shouldn't be spewing it on almost a daily basis. For someone who tries to campaign on unifying our great nation he certainly seems to be accomplishing the exact opposite, a polarization of his own party. (Not even to mention the polarization that will occur in the general election when the Republicans use Reverend Wright's statements in a rigorous, and most likely effective, advertising blitz against Obama.)

SO MUCH FOR HIS MESSAGE OF HOPE and CHANGE. Where is the change from traditional politics Obama? It seems you are playing the same game as most every politician before you; making promises in public that won't translate into action when you get into office. The public first became aware of this when his advisers spoke with foreign diplomats in Canada and Britain that portrayed his view on Iraq and NAFTA in a different light then he was espousing on the campaign trail.But the most disturbing showing of his hidden lies came with the emergence of Reverend Wright's statements. At first he claimed he had never heard any of the statements but during his "epic race speech" he admitted to hearing "some" of the statements and denounced them. So he is trapped in yet another lie while the waves of controversy following Rev. Wright continue to slowly crush his chances of winning many demographics throughout the country.

Hopefully the superdelegates can come to their senses and realize that Hillary is the best option because of her improved showing in exit polls in almost every race/age group. Obama used to have strong showing amongst young voters, white men and his black following but has recently lost a lot of ground with young voters and white men. I don't see this as a coincidence. As a prior Obama supporter my support stayed steady until the Rev Wright statements surfaced and racial/religious tensions arose. I was personally displeased that Obama wouldn't denounce his pastor and I think I can speak for many people when I say he lost support because of this. From a logical perspective I think that most white churchgoers across the nation question why Obama would go to that church for 20 years hearing Wright's statements on a regular basis and never leave or confront the man on this issue.

In addition to the divisions Obama has created through his own lies I think perhaps the worst indiscretion in his campaign has been the problem of seating Florida and Michigan. In my mind, unity means the entirety of something. So, if Obama really wants to unify our country why would he want to alienate voters from Michigan and Florida so they are poised to vote against the democrats if he is the nominee. If he was really concerned about unity he would allow the majority of citizens in these two states to be heard through a revote regardless of the small amount of people who might be left out through small legal complications the Obama camp can find. If he was more concerned about unifying this country instead of just winning the nomination he wouldn't be worried about having revotes in these two states. If anybody should drop out of this race it should be Obama. If we are talking about who will lose the general election it will surely be Obama. I can tell you now that democrats have nothing to worry about in getting young people to vote come November even if Obama is off the ticket. I think there is more than enough hatred for the failed policy of the Bush administration that either democrat would easily fire up the passionate hatred for Bush and a third "Bush" term. Under the same logic I would also venture to say that democrats won't loose many black votes to McCain if/when Clinton rightfully gets the nomination.